Changed terms, and what the comparison shows

2026-09-03

The most expensive changes are the ones nobody called a change.

The most expensive changes are the ones nobody called a change. Scope grows sentence by sentence — one extra reel here, one licence extension there. The change arrives by e-mail, in a comment or in a new version of a file — and half a year later it is hard to show where it came from.

The difference in amount is computed by code in minor units, with the direction — up or down, and by exactly how much. You see what was added, what changed the amount and which deadline moved — before you agree to it. An amendment cannot be approved without naming the source of the change — the field is required and stays with the new version of the term.

You see separately what was added to the scope and what changed a value that was already agreed. You paste the proposed change and we set it against what you have already confirmed. You carry the other side's comments into an amendment with one click as the source of the change — the terms you write yourself, because someone else's text does not become an agreed term on its own here.

The old version of the term stays in the record — we overwrite nothing and delete nothing. Approving creates a NEW version of the term, and the old one stays in the record as evidence — we overwrite nothing. The comparison itself writes nothing — the change goes in through a separate request, which is rejected without a named source.

We are exploring showing the financial effect of a proposed change next to the difference itself.

Informational material, not legal advice. We state the parameter and where to verify it — we do not assess your situation.